Table of Contents

Part I: Criminalisation and Wrongdoing 1. The Nature of Criminalisation 2. Wrongfulness and Reasons Part II: Harm 3. Crossing the Harm Threshold 4. Remote Harms: the Need for an Extended Harm Principle 5. On the Imputation of Remote Harms Part III: Offence 6. Rethinking the Offence Principle 7. The Distinctiveness of the Offence Principle 8. Mediating Principles for Offensive Conduct Part IV: Paternalism 9. Reflections on Paternalistic Prohibitions 10. Some Varieties of Indirect Paternalism Part V: Drawing Back from Criminal Law 11. Mediating Considerations and Constraints 12. Two-step Criminalisation

About the Author

A P Simester is Professor of Law at the National University of Singapore and Fellow of Wolfson College, University of Cambridge. Andreas von Hirsch is Honorary Professor at the Law Faculty, Goethe-University Frankfurt, in Germany. He is also Emeritus Honorary Professor of Penal Theory and Penal Law at the University of Cambridge, and Honorary Fellow of Wolfson College. Much of his previous writing has appeared under his Anglicised name, Andrew von Hirsch.

Reviews

...this elegant, closely argued and convincing book is of great value and can be expected to be of lasting influence.
*Edinburgh Law Review, Volume 17*

...Crimes, Harms and Wrongs ... is a welcome addition to this field, and should clarify the reader's thinking on a breathtakingly broad range of issues...This is an important book, and one that should appeal to advanced students and academics with an interest in the proper extent of the criminal law. ...this book is remarkable for its careful analytical structure...the author's consistently and conscientiously draw distinctions which aid in the understanding of complex areas. Those familiar with criminalisation theory already will definitely find this a rewarding and engaging book, which – through its structured and analytical approach – ought to provoke much thought and discussion. The book's consideration of not only Anglo-American theory and law, but also German legal doctrines and writings on criminalisation, should ensure that this debate reaches new heights in the future.
*Social and Legal Studies, Volume 21, Number 2*

...the result of [the authors'] many decades of thought and writing on this fundamental subject is an integrated, accessible, philosophically sophisticated discussion of this subject.
*Criminal Law Journal, Volume 36*

...A.P. Simester and Andreas von Hirsch present an informed and systematic account of the principles that, in their view, should structure decisions about what to criminalize, and when.
*Criminal Law and Criminal Justice Books*

An outstanding work, original in many respects and meticulous in its arguments. It represents the greatest advance on this subject since Feinberg's four volumes.... I would expect this book to attract a great deal of discussion among lawyers and philosophers. I would also expect that discussion to be positive ... an outstanding contribution to the re-invigorated criminalization debate.
*Andrew Ashworth, All Souls College, Oxford*

Important, original, interesting, and often ingenious. Unlike some recent competitive books it has the virtue of making sound arguments. And like everything else the authors have written, it is a joy to read. ... This is an absolutely wonderful book. I look forward to seeing it in print.
*Douglas Husak, Rutgers University*

Head and shoulders above anything else that I have read in criminalisation theory so far.
*Antje du Bois Pedain, University of Cambridge*