J.H.H. Weiler: Introduction: Cain and Abel - Convergence and
Divergence in International Trade Law
1: Marise Cremona: EC External Commercial Policy after Amsterdam:
Authority and Interpretation within Interconnected Legal Orders
2: Robert Howse: Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation
in International Trade Law: The Early Years of WTO
Jurisprudence
3: Jacques H. J. Bourgeois: The European Court of Justice and the
WTO: Problems and Challenges
4: Joanne Scott: On Kith and Kine (and Crustaceans): Trade and
Environment in the EU and WTO
5: Frederick M. Abbott: The North American Integration Regime and
its Implications for the World Trading System
J.H.H. Weiler: Epilogue: Towards a Common Law
J.H.H. Weiler is Manley Hudson Professor of Law and Jean Monnet
Chair at Harvard University.
He is a faculty member at the College of Europe in Bruges, Belgium
and an Honorary Professor at University College, London University
and at the University of Copenhagen. He is Director of the
Academy-on-Line of the Academy of European Law, EUI, Florence.
He is Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
`Although easily readable, the audience for this volume is
primarily lawyers or persons trained in the law. ... Together ...
the essays constitute a coherent introduction to the evolution,
major institutions, issues and developments in international trade
law. ...Robert Howse's essay on 'Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty
Interpretation in International Trade' .. provides a good critique
of the major legitimacy and overnance issues associated with
the
regulatory instruments of international trade as well as a good
theoretical framework for understanding them.'
Interights Bulletin Vol. 13, No. 4, 2001
`this is an excellent, thought-provoking collection of essays which
can be read with profit by both European and international lawyers.
There has been much discussion coparing the institutional stuctures
of the EU and the WTO, in particular about whether one can speak of
the "constitution" of the WTO. This volume concentrates rather on
the substantive law of the two organisations. This departure is to
be welcomed.'
Matthew Happold International and Comparative Law Quarterly
 |
Ask a Question About this Product More... |
|
