Table of Contents

Acknowledgements Preface Introduction Part I: What Philosophical Problem Does the Transition Project of the Opus postumum Address? Introduction Kant’s philosophia naturalis The systematic function of the "General Remark to Dynamics" Alternative accounts of the Transition Project The schematism of the Transition Project The "Octaventwurf" and the "Early Fascicles" of the Opus postumum Conclusion Part II: Why is a Transition Project in Practical Philosophy Required? Introduction Mundus Intelligibilis and Mundus Sensibilis A priori foundation and empirical open-endedness of ethics Casuistry and ethical eonflict Kant’s alleged rigorism Conclusion Part III: Kant’s "Aesthetics of Morals" Introduction The four mediating concepts in the "Aesthetics of Morals" Implications The unfinished Metaphysics of Morals and the Opus postumum Conclusion Part IV: Conclusion Bibliography Index

Promotional Information

A new approach to understanding the Opus postumum and Metaphysics of Morals that reveal systematic parallels between Kant’s late practical and theoretical philosophy.

About the Author

Oliver Thorndike is Lecturer of Philosophy at Loyola University, Maryland, USA.

Reviews

The book is written in a lucid and accessible style, contains a wealth of original arguments, and discusses critically but charitably important contributions to Kant studies, old and new. It is an excellent piece of research and will be read with much benefit by both students and advanced Kant scholars.
*The Review of Metaphysics*

Thorndike’s book displays impressive scholarly engagement and offers a breadth of material: from Kant’s pre-critical to very late phases, to his intellectual surroundings, such as Wolffian philosophia naturalis and Newtonian physics, Stoic ethics, Kant’s letter exchanges, etc. It is clearly the result of many years of deep and serious engagement with the material. It does cast a fresh light on many central and controversial issues such as Kant’s alleged rigorism, the worry that a formal principle cannot be action guiding, etc. This book deserves a wide reception among Kant scholars.
*British Journal for the History of Philosophy*

The book's historical thesis is compelling and plausible. Thorndike's juxtaposition of Kant's 1796-1798 texts on natural and moral philosophy is an innovative contribution to scholarship and brings to the fore important, yet subtle, strands in Kant's late philosophy. Furthermore, Thorndike offers an intriguing account of the moral transition, according to which moral feelings make possible the transition by serving as schemata for the moral law … [A] fruitful first step in the direction of a reconceptualization of Kant's natural and practical philosophy.
*Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews*

Thorndike’s work demonstrates compellingly the continuity and coherence of Kant’s ambitions for the transcendental philosophy across the entire critical period all the way through the Opus postumum and the Metaphysics of Morals of his later years. From the outset, Kant set himself the object of developing a metaphysical foundation for the law-governed systematicity of actual experience in nature and in moral choice. The “Transition Project” was no new impulse in Kant but the last great effort of the philosopher, in natural philosophy and also in ethical theory, to bring his system to closure.
*John H. Zammito, John Antony Weir Professor of History, Rice University, USA*

All good philosophy begins in wonder –and so does Thorndike’s insightful new book. Its thesis is simple: the dualisms at the heart of Kant’s critical philosophy make the problem of finding a lawful connection between the formal (rational, a priori) structures and their material (empirical, a posteriori) manifestation utterly pervasive. Setting up a system of mirrors that reflects how the “Transition Project” shapes the development of Kant’s late theoretical and practical philosophy alike, Thorndike invites us to wonder how we could have ignored what was confronting us all along. It is a major accomplishment in a field saturated by titles to make an old problem newborn.
*Pablo Muchnik, Associate Professor, Institute for Liberal Arts and Interdisciplinary Studies, Emerson College, USA*