Table of Contents

List of illustrations; Notes on contributors; Acknowledgements; List of abbreviations; Introduction: reading the medieval in early modern England David Matthews and Gordon McMullan; Part I. Period: 1. Diachronic history and the shortcomings of Medieval Studies James Simpson; 2. Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay and the rhetoric of temporality Deanne Williams; Part II. Text: 3. Langland, apocalypse and the early modern editor Larry Scanlon; 4. Public ambition, private desire and the last Tudor Chaucer David Matthews; Part III. Nation: 5. The vulgar history of the Order of the Garter Stephanie Trigg; 6. Myths of origin and the struggle over nationhood in medieval and early modern England Anke Bernau; 7. The colonisation of early Britain on the Jacobean stage Gordon McMullan; Part IV. Geography: 8. Tamburlaine, sacred space and the heritage of medieval cartography Bernhard Klein; 9. Leland's Itinerary and the remains of the medieval past Jennifer Summit; Part V. Reformation: 10. John Bale and reconfiguring the 'medieval' in Reformation England Cathy Shrank; 11. Medieval penance, Reformation repentance and Measure for Measure Sarah Beckwith; 12. Medieval poetics and Protestant Magdalenes Patricia Badir; Afterword David Wallace; Notes; Select bibliography; Index.

Promotional Information

A contributory volume on the effect of medieval culture and literature on early modern England.

About the Author

Gordon McMullan is Reader in English at King's College London. David Matthews is Lecturer in Middle English Literature and Culture, School of Arts, Histories and Cultures at the University of Manchester.

Reviews

"The last few years have witnessed a growing interest, largely on the part of medievalists, in examining the divide between the medieval and early modern periods.1 The essay collection reviewed here does an excellent job of showing how rich and complex these cross-period investigations can be— when the medieval period is not merely a backdrop to the early modern period but, rather, when these two periods are set in conversation."
-Katherine Little, Fordham University

"The fruits of a cross-period approach are quite apparent in the number of essays that demonstrate how medieval ways of thinking continued to haunt early modern writers, shaping their perception of what is new in their own period."
-Katherine Little, Fordham University

"These essays ultimately read the divide between medieval and early modern as an immensely generative struggle rather than a rejection or clean break."
-Katherine Little, Fordham University

"Scanlon, Simpson, and the essays in the first group discussed above are all clearly attuned to recent debates, whereas the essays by Matthews and Trigg, among others in the second and third groups described here, seem to adhere to an older version of ‘‘medievalism,’’ in which the focus is less on an interchange of modes of thinking than the early modern period’s use of the medieval for its own ends. Nevertheless, the essays here offer much material for reflection and chart some new lines of inquiry."
-Katherine Little, Fordham University