Table of Contents
Acknowledgments
Terminology
Chapter 1 – Online Misogyny: Law and the Digital Feminist
Chapter 2 – [Online] Misogyny: Old Problems, New Media?
2.1. Introduction – An open, participatory ideal?
2.2. Social Media Abuse as a Modern Phenomenon
2.3. From Offline to Online: the digital misogyny ‘switch’
2.3.1. The Normalisation of Online Abuse
2.3.2. Political Campaigning & The ‘Techlash’
2.3.3. Intersectional Abuse – Still Misogyny, Still a Techlash?
2.4. Conclusion
Chapter 3 – Online Communications: The Legal Landscape
3.1. Introduction – Comprehension, Competence, and Cohesion?
3.2. The Limitation Paradox
3.2.1. The Devolution Settlement
3.2.2. The European Union Remit
3.2.3. Limitations – Competence v Cohesion?
3.3. Legal Challenges of Online Communications – Where Does the Problem Lie?
Part I – Threats & Threats to Kill
3.4. Threats & Threats to Kill
Part II – Stalking & Harassment
3.5. Stalking
3.6. Harassment
Part III – Communications
3.7. Communications Networks
3.8. Conclusions
Chapter 4 – Hate Crime: The Limits of the Law
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Hate crime: development and classifications
4.2.1. Defining hate crime
4.2.2. Hate crime v Hate speech
4.2.3. Hate speech and human rights
4.2.4. Hate crime: the current legal framework in England & Wales
4.2.5. Who is protected against hate crime?
4.3. Extending the boundaries of hate crime: hate (re)defined
4.3.1. Why the need to include gender in hate crime laws
4.3.2. Gender as a protected characteristic: towards law reform
4.4. Online hate (crimes)
4.4.1. Does online make it different?
4.5. Online misogyny as a hate crime
4.6. Conclusions
Chapter 5 - #OVAW, The Internet & Hate: Unfinished (Legal) Business
5.1. The realities of everyday, gender-based hate
5.2. Online misogyny: not a legislative priority
5.3. Implications for legal response and regulation
5.4. Final Thought
Index
Dr Kim Barker is Lecturer in Law at Stirling University.
Dr Olga Jurasz is Senior Lecturer in Law at The Open University.
Ask a Question About this Product More... |