1. Moral and Legal Responsibility 2. The Nature and Functions of Responsibility 3. Responsibility and Culpability 4. Responsibility and Causation 5. Responsibility and Personality 6. Grounds and Bounds of Responsibility 7. Realising Responsibility 8. Responsibility in Public Law 9. Thinking about Responsibility References Index
For 20 years, Peter Cane taught law at Corpus Christi College, Oxford. Since 1997 he has been a Professor of Law in the Research School of Social Sciences at the Australian National University.
…an impressive and comprehensive discussion of the treatment of
responsibility in the law-a discussion that ranges across nearly
every field of law, and across jurisdictions, supported by detailed
references to cases and supplemented by knowledgeable summaries of
commentary by lawyers, legal philosophers, and moral
philosophers.
*Ethics*
Peter Cane has written an impressively wide-ranging and
illuminating booka truly commendable piece of work. Cane's book
deserves a large audience among legal, moral, and political
philosophers.
*Philosophical Review*
…it offers a notably clear and robust formulation of a social
approach towards responsibility… he has plenty of interesting and
illuminating insights to offer…lawyers and philosphers alike will
learn a great deal from this careful dissection of topics…
*Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol 26, No 3, pp 593-608*
This is a wide-ranging, highly sophisticated work which looks at
concepts of responsibility in law across a range of areas.
*Adelaide Law Review*
'Responsibility in Law and Morality' is a challenging and valuable
book. Although I have criticised Cane's account of responsibilty in
this review, I do not wish to leave the reader with the impression
that his book is anything but valuable and rewarding it is an
illuminating study of responsibilty in law. It is my view that
modern lawyers have a great deal to learn from its approach.
Accordingly, apart from being essential reading for anyone
interested in legal theory, the book has much to teach any lawyer
with even the smallest interest in the justifications of legal
liability.
*Melbourne University Law Review*
Ask a Question About this Product More... |