In September 1958, Guinea claimed its independence, rejecting a constitution that would have relegated it to junior partnership in the French Community. In all the French empire, Guinea was the only territory to vote “No.”
Elizabeth Schmidt is professor emeritus of history at Loyola University Maryland. Her previous books include Foreign Intervention in Africa: From the Cold War to the War on Terror; Cold War and Decolonization in Guinea, 1946–1958; Mobilizing the Masses: Gender, Ethnicity, and Class in the Nationalist Movement in Guinea, 1939–1958; Peasants, Traders, and Wives: Shona Women in the History of Zimbabwe, 1870–1939; and Decoding Corporate Camouflage: U.S. Business Support for Apartheid.
“A compelling narrative of the history of nation building in
Guinea.... Schmidt deftly portrays the events from an African
perspective, using colonial archives, interviews with activists,
the era’s popular political songs, and photographs.... What
simultaneously emerges in this nuanced treatment is a richer
understanding of the pragmatic rather than purely visionary
leadership of the famous Sékou Touré.”
*CHOICE*
“Schmidt’s study is a masterpiece of African, Guinean, and colonial
historiography that should be read by all students of empire.”
*Journal of Asian and African Studies*
“(A) vivid portrait of the political environment and pressures
facing the Guinean RDA in the years following the Second World
War.…Schmidt’s contributions to the study of the RDA and
decolonization in Guinea will likely remain unparalleled for the
foreseeable future.”
*Jeffrey Ahlman, West Africa Review*
“The publication of Cold War and Decolonization in Guinea is a
welcome event. Its archival and oral documentation create original
possibilities for Anglophone readers in particular to explore
diverse dynamics and tensions within late-colonial Guinean society
and politics.
*Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History*
“Although other political histories of Guinea use independence as a
starting point, in this work Elizabeth Schmidt takes a critical
step back to analyze how Guinea arrived at its historic ‘No’
vote.”
*The Historian*
“By setting African divisions against an international background
of cold war and French repression, (Cold War and Decolonization in
Guinea) provides a welcome and informative account, in English, of
the distinctive Guinean struggles for independence.”
*International History Review*
“Unlike a considerable number of works on decolonization in Africa,
especially those published in the immediate aftermath of these
epochal events, Schmidt moves away from the staple historiography
privileging the role of the educated elite and restores the voices
of the masses—including those of women—to the history of
decolonization.”
*African Studies Review*
“By shifting the focus from elite to grassroot politics, Schmidt
paints a picture of French decolonization in sub-Saharan Africa
that is a welcome corrective to those earlier studies that appeared
to view decolonization as the outcome of an essentially linear and
orderly process, rather than the product of political
struggle.”
*Journal of African History*
“Supported by clear and strong historical evidence, (Elizabeth
Schmidt)shows that political decision making in Guinea was far more
influenced by the bottom rather than the top.... (Cold War and
Decolonization in Africa) is rich with data and empirical examples
that illustrate some of the major themes in the history of
decolonization, African nationalism, and the rise of one-party
states in Africa.”
*International Journal of African Historical Studies*
“For students and scholars of diplomacy, Schmidt demonstrates how
activists on the local level, in this case Guinean activists,
shaped and determined their own destiny in the face of high-level
Cold War politics, rather, as is often supposed, than being
manipulated by the Great Power actors.”
*H-Diplo*
“Schmidt highlights a surprisingly overlooked aspect of the
decolonization process by integrating Cold War tensions on the
macro level into the transformation of local politics on the micro
level.”
*American Historical Review*
 |
Ask a Question About this Product More... |
|
