Table of Contents

Editor's Introduction Preface Introduction I. Of the division of Philosophy II. Of the realm of Philosophy in general III. Of the Critique of Judgment as a means of combining the two parts of Philosophy into a whole IV. Of Judgment as a faculty legislating a priori V. The principle of the formal purposiveness of nature is a transcendental principle of Judgment VI. Of the combination of the feeling of pleasure with the concept of the purposiveness of nature VII. Of the aesthetical representation of the purposiveness of nature VIII. Of the logical representation of the purposiveness of nature IX. Of the connexion of the legislation of Understanding with that of Reason by means of the Judgment First Part: Critique of the Aesthetical Judgment First Division: Analytic of the Aesthetical Judgment First Book: Analytic of the Beautiful First Moment of the judgment of taste, according to quality 1. The judgment of taste is aesthetical 2. The satisfaction which determines the judgment of taste is disinterested 3. The satisfaction in the pleasant is bound up with interest 4. The satisfaction in the good is bound up with interest 5. Comparison of the three specifically different kinds of satisfaction Second Moment of the judgment of taste, viz. according to quantity 6. The Beautiful is that which apart from concepts is represented as the object of a universal satisfaction 7. Comparison of the Beautiful with the Pleasant and the Good by means of the above characteristic 8. The universality of the satisfaction is represented in a judgment of Taste only as subjective 9. Investigation of the question whether in the judgment of taste the feeling of pleasure precedes or follows the judging of the object Third Moment of judgments of taste, according to the relation of the purposes which are brought into consideration therein 10. Of purposiveness in general 11. The judgment of taste has nothing at its basis but the form of the purposiveness of an object (or of its mode of representation) 12. The judgment of taste rests on a priori grounds 13. The pure judgment of taste is independent of charm and emotion 14. Elucidation by means of examples 15. The judgment of taste is quite independent of the concept of perfection 16. The judgment of taste, by which an object is declared to be beautiful under the condition of a definite concept, is not pure 17. Of the Ideal of Beauty Fourth Moment of the judgment of taste, according to the modality of the satisfaction in the object 18. What the modality in a judgment of taste is 19. The subjective necessity, which we ascribe to the judgment of taste, is conditioned 20. The condition of necessity which a judgment of taste asserts is the Idea of a common sense 21. Have we ground for presupposing a common sense? 22. The necessity of the universal agreement that is thought in a judgment of taste is a subjective necessity, which is represented as objective under the presupposition of a common sense General remark on the first section of the Analytic Second Book: Analytic of the Sublime 23. Transition from the faculty which judges of the Beautiful to that which judges of the Sublime 24. Of the divisions of an investigation into the feeling of the sublime A. Of the Mathematically Sublime 25. Explanation of the term "sublime" 26. Of that estimation of the magnitude of natural things which is requisite for the Idea of the Sublime 27. Of the quality of the satisfaction in our judgments upon the Sublime B. Of the Dynamically Sublime in Nature 28. Of Nature regarded as Might 29. Of the modality of the judgment upon the sublime in nature General remark upon the exposition of the aesthetical reflective Judgment Deduction of [pure] aesthetical judgments 30. The Deduction of aesthetical judgments on the objects of nature must not be directed to what we call Sublime in nature, but only to the Beautiful. 31. Of the method of deduction of judgments of Taste 32. First peculiarity of the judgment of Taste 33. Second peculiarity of the judgment of Taste 34. There is no objective principle of Taste possible 35. The principle of Taste is the subjective principle of Judgment in general 36. Of the problem of a Deduction of judgments of Taste 37. What is properly asserted a priori of an object in a judgment of Taste 38. Deduction of judgments of Taste 39. Of the communicability of a sensation 40. Of Taste as a kind of sensus communis 41. Of the empirical interest in the Beautiful 42. Of the intellectual interest in the Beautiful 43. Of Art in general 44. Of beautiful Art 45. Beautiful Art is an art, in so far as it seems like nature 46. Beautiful Art is the art of genius 47. Elucidation and confirmation of the above explanation of Genius 48. Of the relation of Genius to Taste 49. Of the faculties of the mind that constitute Genius 50. Of the combination of Taste with Genius in the products of beautiful Art 51. Of the division of the beautiful arts 52. Of the combination of beautiful arts in one and the same product 53. Comparison of the respective aesthetical worth of the beautiful arts 54. Remark second Division: Dialectic of the Aesthetical Judgment 55. 56. Representation of the antinomy of Taste 57. Solution of the antinomy of Taste 58. Of the Idealism of the purposiveness of both Nature and Art as the unique principle of the aesthetical Judgment. 59. Of Beauty as the symbol of Morality 60. Appendix: Of the method of Taste Second Part: Critique of the Teleological Judgment 61. Of the objective purposiveness of Nature First Division: Analytic of the Teleological Judgment 62. Of the objective purposiveness which is merely formal as distinguished from that which is material 63. Of the relative, as distinguished from the inner, purposiveness of nature 64. Of the peculiar character of things as natural purposes 65. Things regarded as natural purposes are organised beings 66. Of the principle of judging of internal purposiveness in organised beings 67. Of the principle of the teleological judging of nature in general as a system of purposes 68. Of the principle of Teleology as internal principle of natural science second Division: Dialectic of the Teleological Judgment 69. What is an antinomy of the Judgment? 70. Representation of this antinomy 71. Preliminary to the solution of the above antinomy 72. Of the different systems which deal with the purposiveness of nature 73. None of the above systems give what they pretend 74. The reason that we cannot treat the concept of a Technic of nature dogmatically is the fact that a natural purpose is inexplicable 75. The concept of an objective purposiveness of nature is a critical principle of Reason for the reflective Judgment 76. Remark 77. Of the peculiarity of the human Understanding, by means of which the concept of a natural purpose is possible 78. Of the union of the principle of the universal mechanism of matter with the teleological principle in the Technic of nature Appendix: Methodology of the Teleological Judgment 79. Whether teleology must be treated as if it belonged to the doctrine of nature 80. Of the necessary subordination of the mechanical to the teleological principle in the explanation of a thing as a natural purpose 81. Of the association of mechanism with the teleological principle in the explanation of a natural purpose as a natural product 82. Of the teleological system in the external relations of organised beings 83. Of the ultimate purpose of nature as a teleological system 84. Of the final purpose of the existence of a world, i.e. of creation itself 85. Of Physico-theology 86. Of Ethico-theology 87. Of the moral proof of the Being of God 88. Limitation of the validity of the moral proof 89. Of the use of the moral argument 90. Of the kind of belief in a teleological proof of the Being of God 91. Of the kind of belief produced by a practical faith General remarks on Teleology