PREFACE, LIST OF SUBJECT ADVISORS AND CONTRIBUTORS, NOTE TO READERS (INCLUDING DETAILS ABOUT ACCENTS, BEATHINGS, AND SPELLINGS), INTRODUCTORY ESSAY: RELIGION, A-Z TEXT, TOPIC INDEX, TABLE OF CHINESE HEADWORDS GIVEN IN BOTH WADE-GILES AND PIN YIN FORMS
John Bowker is an authority on religious studies.
He has taught at universities in the United States and the UK, is
an Honorary Canon of Canterbury Cathedral, and a well-known
broadcaster on BBC Radio.
Bowker (divinity, Gresham Coll., London) has produced two very different books, though both are focused on world religion. The Oxford Dictionary, whose entries often lack information on etymology and pronunciation, is actually a one-volume desktop encyclopedia for ready reference. Combining brevity of exposition with a massive number of entries in an attempt to be dictionary-like, the work suffers from trying to be comprehensive in breadth of coverage instead of depth. The psychology of religion is discussed in a half-page, for instance, and the Church Fathers get only two sentences. In addition, the entries are uneven in quality; one has the feeling that the 80 contributors are each writing according to his or her own personal interests and styles. Despite these idiosyncracies, the work is a solid reference source for people who want to know only the barest of facts about any religious topic. In World Religions, on the other hand, one has the feeling that Bowker, now the author, is finally freed to range over what he wants to say and how he wants to say it. This book is a bold attempt to meld religious information with expressive art and to use the art as a tool for pedagogy. Each religion is represented by a few brilliantly illustrated icons, paintings, or sculptures, which the author painstakingly annotates to illuminate their theologies and deepen one's insight. Whether he is using Michelangelo's Final Judgment to explain Christian eschatology or a handscroll of Chou Ch'en to explain Taoist concepts of immortality, the emphasis upon the visual makes these religions vibrant and intriguing. There are surprising discrepancies between the two works. World Religions has generous discussions of the ancient Egyptian, Greek, Roman, Norse, and Celtic religions, topics not even included in the Oxford Dictionary. There are also variations of names. Ultimately, World Religions is the more commendable publication, though both books are recommended for most libraries.‘Glenn Masuchika, Chaminade Univ. Lib., Honolulu
 |
Ask a Question About this Product More... |
|
