Table of Contents

Introduction - John C. Poirier and Jeffrey Peterson 1. 'The Devil in the Detail: Exorcising Q from the Beelzebul Controversy' - Eric Eve 2. 'Problems with the Non-Aversion Principle for Reconstructing Q' - Stephen C. Carlson 3. 'Luke—Crank or Creative Genius? How Ancient Rhetoric Makes Sense of Luke’s Order' - Heather M. Gorman 4. 'Too Good to be Q: High Verbatim Agreement in the Double Tradition' - Mark Goodacre 5. 'Luke 11.2-4: The Lord’s Prayer (Abridged Edition)' - Ken Olson 6. 'A Statistical Time Series Approach to the Use of Mark by Matthew and Luke' - Andris Abakuks 7. 'Matthew’s Ending and the Genesis of Acts: The Farrer Hypothesis and the Composition of Luke’s Two Volumes' - Jeffrey Peterson 8. 'Reconsidering the Date of Luke in Light of the Farrer Hypothesis' - David Landry 9. 'Delbert Burkett’s Defense of Q' - John C. Poirier 10. Response - John S. Kloppenborg Bibliography Index

Promotional Information

A collection original essays from leading scholars reflecting the newest thinking on the Farrer solution to the synoptic problem

About the Author

Jeffrey Peterson is Jack C. and Ruth Wright Professor of New Testament, Austin Graduate School of Theology, USA. John C. Poirier is Chair of Biblical Studies at Kingswell Theological Seminary, USA.

Reviews

Anyone who is interested in the new aspects of Q-discussion in the context of the question of the synoptic problem should study this contribution.
*Theologische Rundschau (Bloomsbury translation)*

... [This] volume presents numerous interesting observations ...
*The Biblical Annals*