Table of Contents

I: Introduction. A. Method. B. The International Supervisory Function and the National Margin of Appreciation Doctrine. C. The International Supervisory Function and the National Margin of Appreciation Doctrine: Survey of the Cases. D. Birth of the Margin Doctrine. E. Expansion of the Doctrine beyond Derogation. II: Leading Cases to 1979: Toward Standards. A. Criminal and Civil Due Processes: Neumeister, Stögmüller, Ringeisen, Wemhoff, Matznetter, König, Delcourt, Luedicke, Balkacem and Koç Cases. B. Personal Freedoms: Belgian Linguistic Case; Foundations of Non-Derogation Margin Analysis. C. Personal Freedoms: The `Restricted Environments' Cases of the Early 1970s: Introduction. D. Personal Freedoms: The 1970s `Middle Period'. E. Findings and Conclusions with Regard to the Pre-1979 Case Law. III: Leading Cases since 1979: The Assertion of Standards. A. Introduction. B. Criminal and Civil Procedural Due Process of Law (Arts. 5 and 6). C. Personal Freedoms. D. Discrimination and Equal Protection. E. Findings and Conclusions with regard to the Post-1979 Case Law. IV: Findings and Conclusions. A. Sources of Law and Methods of Interpretation. B. Classifying the Applicability of National Appreciation Doctrine. C. `Rights Hierarchy', `Rights Continuum', and `Private/Public' Rights Theories. D. An Emerging New Category of Cases? E. The Strasbourg Doctrine on Divided Power Issues. F. Consensus, Margin Doctrine, and Evolutive or Dynamic Interpretation of the Convention's Provisions. G. Summation. V: Provisions of the European Human Rights Convention. VI: Table ofCases. VII: Bibliography.

Reviews

'Yourow's work provides a strong and scholarly base for a theoretical and doctrinal analysis of the concept of margin of appreciation.'
European Journal of International Law, 9 (1998).