Table of Contents

Acknowledgements; 1. Introduction; 2. Soldiers and unconventional problems; 3. Potential explanations of military behavior; 4. Organizational routines; 5. How military routines evolved; 6. Bosnia-Herzegovina; 7. Kosovo; 8. Afghanistan; 9. Conclusion; Bibliography; Index.

Promotional Information

This study of military routines is vital for understanding why soldiers from Western democracies participating in multinational missions vary in their use of force.

About the Author

Cornelius Friesendorf is a Senior Researcher at the Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (IFSH). Previous activities include working for an EU police reform support project in Myanmar, and teaching International Relations at Goethe University Frankfurt. He has published on security sector reform, counter-insurgency, organized crime, and privatized security.

Reviews

'Why are some militaries better at policing, peace operations and counterinsurgency than others? Looking at how the Americans, British and Germans fared in Bosnia, Kosovo and Afghanistan, Cornelius Friesendorf finds that the answer lies in routines which embody each army's biases and practices. This outstanding book exemplifies the importance of organisational analysis in security studies.' Theo Farrell, Executive Dean of Law, Humanities and the Arts, University of Wollongong, Australia

'This book is a superb example of why we need more micro-level, 'bottom up' analysis in the study of international relations. As Friesendorf persuasively demonstrates in his study of western interventions in war-torn countries, governmental agencies implementing policy - in this case militaries - are not merely tools of grand strategists in distant capitals and headquarters but have agency themselves, and their routine everyday practices should therefore be placed more front and center in our analysis. Only with this type of ground-level work can international relations scholars 'see' the important nuances that are otherwise missed from the armchair grand-theorizing that defines so much of the field.' Peter Andreas, John Hay Professor of Political Science and International Studies, Brown University, Rhode Island

'Anyone wondering why the US Army applied warfighting templates to multinational missions in the Balkans and Afghanistan whereas British soldiers patrolled on foot, Germans stayed inside their camps and Italians prioritized crime-fighting should read this book. Unlike most accounts of military interventions, How Western Soldiers Fight uses micro-level routines and behaviour patterns to reveal what really shapes missions.' Alice Hills, Durham University